#general
Trial By Combat
The ancient medieval right of a man to challenge his accuser to personal combat remained vaild under British law exactly 200 years ago. It had been almost forgotten, until, in 1817, a man called Thornton was accused of murdering a woman named Mary Ashford. Thornton claimed the right to decide his guilt or innocence in battle with his accuser, the dead girl's brother - and the law courts were forced to uphold his claim. Because Mary Ashford’s brother refused the challenge, Thornton got off scot-free. Parliament changed the law a year later.
Total Votes
0
Lists
1
Best Rank
#3
Avg Rank
#3
Featured in these lists
-
9 Law-related Facts#generalRank#3
Compare with others in General
Head to head
Trial By Combat vs The chicken
Head to head
Trial By Combat vs You can even ask for the third-party personal injury coverage
Head to head
Trial By Combat vs It safeguards you from facing a financial crisis that may occur in case of road accidents
Head to head
Trial By Combat vs It helps you avoid paying penalties when on the road
Head to head
Trial By Combat vs PrepAway (https://www.prepaway.com/togaf-9-certified-certification-exams.html)
Head to head
Trial By Combat vs Shares – A share is a share in the share capital of a company
Discussion (0)
Sign in
to join the discussion.
No comments yet. Be the first.